This tends to leave Hive users looking for information on their own, then raising questions about what they dig up.įor example, one of the issues that popped up in the past couple of weeks involved the resurfacing of an older, problematic tweet posted by a former employee, Gil Malfabon, who created Hive’s design system. The company has not always been fully transparent about its inner workings, corporate structure, moderation capabilities or sources of funding. This has led to sizable boosts to the user bases of other social apps, including Mastodon, CoHost, Tumblr, CounterSocial, Post News, Koo and Hive, among others.īut it’s also led to increased scrutiny for Hive, a smaller app that until recently was a two-person team. Today, a number of Twitter users are unhappy with the direction Musk is taking the social network and have been seeking alternatives. These aren’t the first concerns that have been raised about Hive in the weeks following its rapid growth, which has been fueled by Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter. Is there not a dev environment where code is fixed, then staged for a release? How bad was the code that it requires a full stop of company operations to rework it? It’s an unusual way to patch bugs, to say the least, and one that raises questions about the development workflow at the company. It also claimed, across several tweets, that they never told the researchers the issues were “fixed” but that they were “fixing” them, eventually deciding to go offline until problems were addressed. Shortly after, Hive announced it was temporarily shutting down its servers to address these problems. However, the researchers found this was not the case, so they took their concerns to the public, warning people against using Hive’s app. Several days later, Hive replied, claiming the issues to be fixed, a Zerforschung blog post explains. The researchers, a part of a German collective called Zerforschung, claimed they confidentially reported the security vulnerabilities to Hive’s team, noting it was initially difficult to reach a point of contact at the company. The issues they found would allow attackers access to all data, including private posts and messages, shared media and even deleted direct messages, as well as the ability to edit other people’s Hive posts. The company has now taken the fairly radical step of fully shutting down its servers for a couple of days in response to concerns raised by security researchers who discovered a number of critical vulnerabilities on Hive, several of which they say remain unfixed. The team at the newly popular Twitter alternative Hive is in over its head.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |